[Tech1] Help in identifying a photograph - poss another female camerawomanM

[Mike]

I have been intrigued by this thread.  When I joined Tech.Ops in 1960 
the understanding was that the group of Lady Vision mixers "of a certain 
age" had been recruited in around 1946 as Camera operators while the men 
were still in the army.  Molly's reminiscences sort of support this 
story (though she was with the BBC earlier than 1946).  What I now find 
interesting was her mention of a colleague called Rachel.  Could that be 
the legendary Rachel Blaney, famed for the double clunk as she kept the 
next camera on the Preview Monitor?  It ties in with the way that Molly 
had to "mix".

Mike Minchin

On 23/07/2021 12:40, Alexandra Palace Television Society via Tech1 wrote:
>
> My apologies for not replying sooner to this thread, but I have been 
> waiting for an email from Australia where I have tracked down the lady 
> featured in the photograph I shared a couple of weeks ago.
>
> The lady in question is Molly Brownless, (nee Heritage, then Frood), 
> and she was operating the camera in the original photograph!  She was 
> at AP before from April 1946 and was operating an Emitron on the 
> re-opening day!  I’ve been corresponding with Eileen, Molly’s 
> daughter, who was with her the day she received my email – Molly 
> remembers working on the ballet and has a great recall of her days 
> working at AP.  Molly is now 101, loving life and is constantly busy. 
> After emigrating to Australia in 1951 she was a pioneer with 
> Australian television when it was established and went on to have an 
> important career within the industry.
>
> Dr Jeannine Baker (who I give total credit for identifying Molly) has 
> recorded a long interview with her, over three consecutive days.  
> Jeannine has recently given a talk to an Australian conference on 
> Molly career and it will be featured on a new website for the National 
> Film and Sound Archive of Australia.  She is also working on a book 
> about women and technology in television covering the UK and Australia.
>
> So, it would appear the first female camera operator was Molly 
> Brownless – she was at AP on re-opening day in June 1946 and was on 
> her camera during the afternoon transmission.
>
> I have attached some photographs of Molly when at AP in 1946, as well 
> of some celebrating her 101^st birthday.
>
> Here are Molly’s memories of being at Alexandra Palace:
>
> /It was the beginning of April when we went to Alexandra Palace.  From 
> them on we spent all our time trying to pick up whatever we could from 
> people who were around, who were far too frantic to be doing much 
> about our training.  And the girls were looked at somewhat aghast by 
> those who were supposed to be giving what information they could.  I 
> suppose we more or less gravitated towards the things that seemed to 
> interest us mostly.  Audrey and Joan were happy enough on GRAMS, 
> Isobel hung around Studio B watching whatever was going on in, as well 
> us on the upstairs desk to see what she could pick up there.  Rachel 
> was, as far as I remember, from the beginning in Studio A. /
>
> //
>
> /Before we actually reopened Alexandra Palace, in June 1946, there 
> were seven girls on each shift.  First of all, when we started off, 
> everyone was on days, and I didn’t really get to know the people 
> then.  Everyone was working, or not working (as the case may be), 
> hanging around the place trying to pick up what information they 
> could.  I knew them by name, and you obviously got to know them 
> properly later on when the shifts were changed around and so forth, 
> but all the time I was there, there were just two shifts and we worked 
> alternate days and even when one arranged a shift-swap, one didn’t see 
> the person one swapped with because, well, they weren’t there when you 
> were there - even though you could do that arranging. ///
>
> //
>
> /The thing I seem to remember that made our life rather tedious at 
> times was operating the switchboard.  It was up a little wooden 
> ladder, going out of Maintenance at the back of A RACKS.  I think they 
> put us up there to get us out from under their feet.  This little 
> switchboard had very little capability - just two lines and Studio A, 
> Studio B, RACKS, and I’ve forgotten who else was on that switchboard, 
> but only a few.  If more than two people wanted to be connected at a 
> time, it was not possible.  Anyway, we all had to cover it and I 
> seemed to be on it whenever I wasn’t on the camera in the early 
> days.   We also covered CCR at times and writing up the Log Book with 
> timings.  I think I only did GRAMS about two or three times in all the 
> years I was there.  I wasn’t very good at it; I somehow didn’t have 
> the feel for it that some of the girls who came from recording did.  
> I’d been used to dealing with big pieces of equipment at Droitwich.  
> Somehow, I don’t know, those small pieces of equipment didn’t come 
> easily to me.  I was fascinated by the cameras right from the beginning./
>
> //
>
> /I remember a chap called George Rose who had been a pre-war vision 
> mixer - when it was all blokes.  He was the only one who told any of 
> us anything about vision mixing, as such.  Otherwise, we just picked 
> it up by watching whatever went on.  When more of the girls came (and 
> I can’t remember how long it was after the service reopened), but it 
> was probably getting on for a year afterwards - we had somebody 
> allocated to telecine. You had to clean all those mirrors on the 
> Mechau projectors - thirty-two, if I remember rightly – (but I am not 
> absolutely certain about that).  Occasionally, I remember having to 
> operate the projector in the film unit downstairs.  This was where the 
> new telecine was installed when it came, which Gordon Waters took over 
> – that was not long before I left.  I occasionally did Sound Floor, 
> you know, shoving in a microphone either above or below on a stand - 
> above or below the camera – but, mostly, I did camerawork to begin 
> with and, of course, that was my delight. /
>
> //
>
> /I started on cameras right from the first day – the first day we put 
> out a programme which was the day before the Victory Parade, which was 
> a Friday, and it was the afternoon session in Studio B.  I was on 
> Camera 3 (I was mostly on three whichever studio I was in) and so I 
> didn’t, at that time, know very much about Ted Langley who was senior 
> cameraman in Studio A, as Frank Cresswell was the senior camera man in 
> Studio B.  The “iron man” was not really moveable except when your 
> camera was not “on air”.  You could move the camera around obviously, 
> but it was fairly heavy to move whilst you were actually on air.  You 
> could push it with one foot as long as you kept your balance with the 
> other one.  But the distance was only a matter of how far your legs 
> would stretch and still keep your balance and keep control. /
>
> //
>
> /I was on that “iron man” the day the service reopened.  I didn’t 
> realise (in my naïve way), that I was actually going to do the 
> transmission.  I’d being doing the rehearsal, but I hadn’t sort of 
> twigged that having done the rehearsal, I would necessarily do the 
> transmission.  I thought that all these chaps that were dashing around 
> being very, very, important were going to take over the camera and do 
> it on the transmission and I was absolutely vapped when I found that I 
> was doing it! The next day it was the Outside Broadcast of the Victory 
> Parade, while I was in the studio working on “The Squadronnaires” 
> (featuring Harry Lewis, Dame Vera Lynn’s husband).  That was a great 
> time. ///
>
> //
>
> /Now, lining up cameras – that was a daily chore.  Each camera 
> operator took it in turns to line-up their camera, starting with 
> camera 1.  I was usually on either camera 3 or 4, so usually it was 
> after morning tea before I got to line up my camera.  We pointed the 
> camera at a chart, and it went on from there.  RACKS guided you as to 
> what they saw on their screen, and you marked on your glass screen 
> exactly where the picture limits were for that particular camera.  You 
> went slightly beyond this limit, so you could see the boom microphone 
> coming in from the top or something coming in from the sides before it 
> got in shot. We also had to watch out for getting a beam from one of 
> the studio lights light in picture - it used to kill the camera.  
> There used to be a burning smell and the camera had to have a new 
> tube. ///
>
> //
>
> /We used to see a direct picture in the viewfinder.  The camera had 
> two lenses, a lens which went straight to the camera and a lens to the 
> side of it which gave the camera operator the same picture but, being 
> a lens, it inverted it – it was upside down and back to front.  You 
> quickly learned to look at the picture and quickly balance it and go 
> with the movement in the opposite direction to where you would expect 
> to be going looking at the picture!  There was something else we had 
> to worry about too and that was the power lags on the two lenses.  The 
> one that went through to the camera was dead straight on, but the one 
> on the side, of course, to keep on the same picture, had to come at a 
> slight angle from the other one so your picture composition might not 
> be exactly the same as the main camera.  So, you had to do a little 
> bit of adjustment on that one too. /
>
> //
>
> /At the end of transmission, we had to wheel our cameras to the side 
> of the studio and coil up the cables so that the floor of the studio 
> was left clear, ready to build the sets for the next day’s programme.  
> It was a matter of honour that you didn’t leave the place looking a 
> mess. Ted Langley and Ben Blooman were very keen on this, so we had to 
> watch ourselves and make sure everything was just so.///
>
> //
>
> /Now it was after Bimbi Harris came and I’d being doing camerawork for 
> quite some time, and she wanted to do that - I’m not surprised, I 
> thoroughly enjoyed it and didn’t see why she wouldn’t want too!  One 
> day a reporter came from a television magazine and found out about 
> there being a “cameraman” who was female or maybe he found out about 
> two, I’m not quite sure.  Henry Whiting told me that they wanted to do 
> a publicity picture of me on a camera and I was rather tickled at the 
> idea, as you can imagine.  I was actually in Studio A the day the 
> reporter arrived – working on a show.  At the end of the programme, I 
> tried to find this photographer only to discover that Bimbi had 
> already been photographed on Camera 2, which was the Crab!  I can 
> understand why he would have taken her because she would certainly 
> have taken a better picture than I would have done.  But, because she 
> was photographed on a tracking camera and because she wasn’t the first 
> female operator, the blokes were a bit peeved.  Bimbi hadn’t been at 
> the Palace very long and I had been there for a few years at that 
> point, they didn’t think she should have appeared on the tracking 
> camera which, of course, is not one she would have operated, and they 
> thought it should have been me./
>
> //
>
> /Now the next thing that happened which was why I and Bimbi came off 
> cameras  was due to the fact that the camera men wanted to get 
> themselves a higher grade and they were trying to upgrade their pay in 
> relation to the other operators around – it was a very specialised 
> job!  All the cameramen, as far as I know, including me, belonged to 
> the Association of Senior Technicians, and they were expecting this 
> Association to back their claim.  The Association didn’t like me being 
> one of the camera crew because if I could do it then, obviously, it 
> wasn’t such a very skilled job after all.  Henry, to avoid any 
> splitting up of the blokes in the studio I presume, told me that I 
> wouldn’t be able to do camerawork anymore. /
>
> //
>
> /I think everybody was a TA1 when went to Alexandra Palace, but I 
> can’t remember it being stated as a requisite.  However, when we had 
> been there some time a lot of chaps came out of the Forces, they had 
> not necessarily been in the BBC before the War.  The BBC insisted 
> those who were TA1’s would be B Grade.  Up until that time, the 
> difference between operators and engineers had been an exam to get the 
> status of B Grade, but they shifted it up a peg to C, so the exam was 
> between D Grade and C, and that was the start of what became qualified 
> “Engineers” as opposed to us “Operators”.  We were all still in the 
> Engineering Division, but on different grades.  It meant an increase 
> in salary, but not, if I remember correctly very much, and certainly 
> not backdated so it wasn’t quite so startling. /
>
> //
>
> /I remember that somebody on the other shift was actually working 
> quite hard to take the exam.  Bertie Baker, stated quite categorically 
> that no female, even if they passed the exam, would be given a C Grade 
> job, so we could pass the exam if we wanted too but we would still be 
> B Grade.  And so, somewhat to my relief and certainly to the disgust 
> of a number of people, who felt they should have had the same 
> opportunity as the rest did, simmer down. I stayed on B Grade until I 
> left.   Well, as you can imagine, I was pretty peeved about that, not 
> just peeved, I was downright sick about the whole thing.  I don’t know 
> who told Bimbi, it might have been Henry – but, like me, she just 
> wasn’t rostered on cameras again.  Anyway, that was my end of women 
> operating cameras.  Henry decided that because I had been so 
> disappointed about coming off cameras - he thought well, okay she can 
> do some vision mixing and I went virtually from the floor on cameras 
> to vision mixing most of the time. /
>
> //
>
> /When I got round to Vision Mixing we weren’t able to cut, we were 
> only able to fade up and fade out.  A mix was achieved by bringing the 
> fader up onto the first stop, waiting, and then turning it full up 
> whenever we wanted it.  Because of the delay on the picture coming up, 
> we couldn’t just bring one in and take one out as quickly as that 
> without a bit of wind-up to begin with!  They were beautiful knobs, 
> you know, you grasped them, and they filled your hand – you knew you’d 
> got hold of them.  Underneath each fader was a little pushbutton which 
> queued up the next picture that RACKS was supposed to put on the 
> preview channel for us in the Gallery.  In those days there were only 
> two screens in the studio galleries - one was the transmitted picture 
> and the one that RACKS put up on preview whichever that happened to 
> be.  When you had a quick sequence, you had to yell down to RACKS to 
> be able to bring the preview channel up quickly for you, otherwise, 
> you’d be fading up channels without actually having seen them first! ///
>
> //
>
> /For gardening programmes when we used to run a cable from Studio A, 
> out over the balcony, down the front of the building and through a 
> channel underneath the road to the garden on the other side of the 
> road where Fred Streeter would do his programme.  We were always 
> wondering if there was something he was going to hold that would have 
> to be bought back in the studio.  This was always left until the last 
> minute, someone would start taking it back, only to find it was needed 
> back with Fred, and they had to bring it back quickly.  I didn’t do 
> the camera work on the gardening programmes, but I did a lot of cable 
> hauling.  On those days they used to stop the buses using anywhere in 
> the park.  We had to have our badges to get through Alexandra Park and 
> everybody else was kept out except for the buses - but the buses 
> weren’t allowed to stop on their way through. /
>
> //
>
> /I remember we were bored a lot of the time, but somehow or other the 
> whole thing seemed to be absolutely joyous.  We were all enthusiastic, 
> we were all keen on doing the thing we were doing – we didn’t care 
> what we did particularly, as long as we were involved, and involved we 
> certainly got ourselves!/
>
> //
>
> /The “Dive” used to be absolutely beautiful in Spring when all the 
> cherry blossom trees were in bloom.  With hindsight it was really and 
> truly rather a dive!  It’s just that it was there, it was convenient 
> and you could go over there just before the evening transmission and, 
> ahh well . . . . it was a place to relax! ///
>
> I hope the above has been of interest.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Vaughan
>
> Archivist
>
> for and on behalf of
>
> Alexandra Palace Television Society
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Tel:       +44 (0) 1332 729358
>
> Mob:     +44 (0) 7791 780882
>
> E-mail: apts at apts.org.uk 
> <applewebdata://9EC021DE-689D-4FEE-BB87-57500B1D581B/apts@apts.org.uk>
>
> Web: www.apts.org.uk 
> <applewebdata://9EC021DE-689D-4FEE-BB87-57500B1D581B/www.apts.org.uk>
>
> www.youtube.com/aptsarchive 
> <applewebdata://9EC021DE-689D-4FEE-BB87-57500B1D581B/www.youtube.com/aptsarchive>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The Alexandra Palace Television Society is a not-for-profit 
> organisation, dedicated to preserving for present and future 
> generations, the oral and written history of the pioneers who 
> inaugurated the world's first regular public high-definition 
> television service from Alexandra Palace, north London, in 1936.
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
> are addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error please 
> notify the system manager: postmaster at apts.org.uk 
> <applewebdata://9EC021DE-689D-4FEE-BB87-57500B1D581B/postmaster@apts.org.uk>
>
> *From: *Alec Bray <alec.bray.2 at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 7 July 2021 at 10:00
> *To: *Simon Vaughan <simonvaughan.apts at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *APTS Archivist <apts at apts.org.uk>, Tech Ops <tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk>
> *Subject: *Re: [Tech1] Help in identifying a photograph - poss another 
> female camerawoman?
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thank you very much for the photos of the Emitron Cameras! Thanks, 
> too, for the explanation of the horizontal "bar". As I mentioned, I 
> had not seen any photos of the original Emitrons with lens hoods - 
> that front-on view is an interesting photo in its own right.  And I 
> certainly did not release how many different "design iterations" there 
> were for those early Emitrons  and I can see why you thought that she 
> might be operating the camera!!
>
> I have had another go at photo-manipulation.  The vertical cable seems 
> to come from the bottom of the camera (viewfinder) and not from the 
> lady's hand.
>
> The lady is wearing a bangle or a bangle which incorporates a 
> wristwatch - it is clearer in some manipulations as to how the light 
> is reflected.
>
> Do we see the face of the watch in the photo where the lady is barely 
> seen?
>
> Anyway, it seems that the lady in question is doing "something" with 
> something near to or attached to the camera: it seems to be a smallish 
> knob.or cylindrical object, perhaps mounted on a rectangular plinth 
> sticking out from the side of the camera - tricky to see in the shadows.
>
> I hope that this is of interest!  I have reached the limit of what I 
> can do to separate out the grey scale at this area.
>
> A very intriguing picture, Simon - and with your photos of original 
> Emitrons in various configurations you may be able to say what the 
> lady is doing!
>
> -- 
> =======
> Alec Bray
> alec.bray.2 at gmail.com  <mailto:alec.bray.2 at gmail.com>
> Mob:  07789 561 346
> Tel:  0118 981 7502
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> http://www.netintelligence.com/email 
> <http://www.netintelligence.com/email>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 135661 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 53589 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 65950 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 66697 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 574441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210723/76d5caf8/attachment-0004.png>