[Tech1] Admin

[Geoffrey Hawkes]

I was confused at first but realised Bernie was referring to the file size not the size of the spread. It might have been possible to reduce the file size without reducing the spread size or detriment to the readability.
I’ve had issues myself like that when circulating illustrated newsletters to a local interest group and a friend has reduced them successfully for me to avoid the problem of overloading the system,
Geoff

> On 12 Jan 2021, at 11:10, Keith Wicks via Tech1 <tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> Perhaps an exception should be allowed sometimes. I was pleased that this image was large enough for me to be able to read the smallest text. It's sometimes frustrating if one cannot do that.
> KW
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 10:57, Albert Barber via Tech1 <tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk> wrote:
>> Sorry Chaps
>> 
>> > On 12 Jan 2021, at 00:39, Dave Plowman via Tech1 <tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk> wrote:
>> > 
>> > In article <3e7d3da0-6bb4-be5c-ea14-85681d813630 at gmail.com>,
>> >   Bernard Newnham via Tech1 <tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> Please stop forwarding the spread from Eagle. It was oversized when 
>> >> Albert sent it the first time.
>> > 
>> > I tend to delete oversized mails on my server, so don't even read them. I
>> > forget how many comic ones this was, but quite a few.
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> >    Dave Plowman     dave at davesound.co.uk     London SW 12
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > Tech1 mailing list
>> > Tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk
>> > http://tech-ops.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tech1 mailing list
>> Tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk
>> http://tech-ops.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk
> -- 
> Tech1 mailing list
> Tech1 at tech-ops.co.uk
> http://tech-ops.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tech-ops.co.uk/pipermail/tech1_tech-ops.co.uk/attachments/20210112/365919b3/attachment.html>