[Tech1] iMac
Chris Woolf
chris at chriswoolf.co.uk
Fri Jan 24 10:35:40 CST 2020
On 24/01/2020 13:57, Dave Plowman via Tech1 wrote:
> .... [serial interface] If it does the job, why change for the sake of it?
All these older formats and interfaces get changed because they have too
many drawbacks. RS232 and the like were a struggle to set up because
they couldn't be plug-'n'-play - you had to set BAUD rate, stop bits,
parity and heaven knows what to get the interface running. OKish for
one-off fixed set-ups but a right pain for everyday purposes.
Old serial protocols were also very limited in terms of speed and
sophistication. There was no useful error correction, and for the
fastest speed (19200) the max cable length was only about 15m, or 40
with low capacitance cable. In terms of energy needed they were also
quite power hungry compared to modern versions.
I agree about the problem with industrial style connectors, but that's
been addressed by people like Neutrik with the Ethercon (for ethernet
communications), and similar designs in an MIL shell that covers RJ45
and USB. Of course for the most part, now, coaxial fibre connections are
preferred because they are even more robust in mechanical and electrical
terms.
I do understand the irritation as older, feebler standards are demoted,
but the replacements do offer enormous improvements and make good sense.
Expecting modern computers to have conversations with each other at
push-bike speeds using the most basic of protocols isn't really defensible.
Chris Woolf
More information about the Tech1
mailing list